have you ever seen this in Redhat or Fedora ?
Code:
[root@localhost anyweb]# ifconfig
bash: ifconfig: command not found
the reason... even though you are logged in as root, is because of the WAY you logged in.
let's look at the way i logged in by seeing the whole picture...
Code:
[anyweb@localhost anyweb]$ su
Password:
[root@localhost anyweb]# ifconfig
bash: ifconfig: command not found
[root@localhost anyweb]#
i logged in to root by using su, now that does make me root, but it doesnt give me root's path to all the lovely things root normally has access to..... which explains the errors above.
So, to get root and roots path simply do like this
Code:
[anyweb@localhost anyweb]$ su -
Password:
[root@localhost root]# ifconfig
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:2D:46:B2:5F
inet addr:192.168.0.117 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:181014 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:173787 errors:322 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:86004986 (82.0 Mb) TX bytes:25431537 (24.2 Mb)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x100
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:2598 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2598 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1777456 (1.6 Mb) TX bytes:1777456 (1.6 Mb)
[root@localhost root]#
notice now, that ifconfig WORKS.
while we are here, look at the first bit of code again, when i logged in as su (without the DASH) root was labelled as
Code:
[root@localhost anyweb]#
but after logging in as su - root is now labelled as
Code:
[root@localhost root]#
see the difference ?
for more info.. about why this happens have a look at this live chat on IRC i had...
Quote:<anyweb> is the su - phenonemon only common to redhat/fedora or all linux ? as in command not found when su versus su ---- TH0R sets channel limit to 200
<hardly_ev> as far my experience proves it "su -" is distribution independent ;)
<|SyKo|> hehaeh never heard of a "su - " phenomenon
<slackmin> i believe you need to adjust your PATH variable
<hardly_ev> however it depends on envirnoment setup
<slackmin> yes look at your .login .loginsh and so on
<anyweb> in redhat and fedora su and su - make a big difference
<anyweb> as in > [/url][url=<___base_url___>/index.php?showtopic=549][/url][url=<___base_url___>/index.php?showtopic=549]https://www.linux-noob.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=549
<anyweb> so i was just wondering is it only those distros, or do others also have this problem
<crib> read the su manpage.
<hardly_ev> anyweb: the - makes su execute .login .loginrc and so on for the user you "su" into
<hardly_ev> anyweb: as crib said read the mans ;)
<crib> typing only 'su' will not load the environment of the user you are changing to. it will merely substitute your UID and GID.
<ducch> anyweb thats 31337~
<anyweb> thats not my question tho, my question is how many distros are affected the same way
<hardly_ev> anyweb: su works the same way on most of the distros
<anyweb> so do most distros also need the - hardly_ev ?
<hardly_ev> anyweb: yep... su behaves the same way in almost any distro I worked with