Linux-Noob Forums
mysql and hyperthreading - Printable Version

+- Linux-Noob Forums (https://www.linux-noob.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Linux Server Administration (https://www.linux-noob.com/forums/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: LAMP (https://www.linux-noob.com/forums/forum-83.html)
+--- Thread: mysql and hyperthreading (/thread-2039.html)

mysql and hyperthreading - hijinks - 2006-04-07


We all know Intel hyped this hyperthreading BS.. now there are some application that actually get improved performance with it on.. most things really don't though.. and even are slower with it on. In all my tests.. mysql is one of them. I used mysql bench and the standard /etc/my.cnf that comes installed with the rpms

 

HT on



Code:
alter-table:    Total time: 11 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr  0.03 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  0.09 CPU)
ATIS:           Total time: 15 wallclock secs ( 5.16 usr  1.53 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  6.69 CPU)
big-tables:     Total time: 11 wallclock secs ( 3.20 usr  3.04 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  6.24 CPU)
connect:        Total time: 71 wallclock secs (25.68 usr 18.76 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys = 44.44 CPU)
create:         Total time: 66 wallclock secs ( 4.96 usr  1.76 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  6.72 CPU)
insert:         Total time: 793 wallclock secs (293.21 usr 85.55 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys = 378.76 CPU)
select:         Total time: 353 wallclock secs (27.53 usr  8.26 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys = 35.79 CPU)
transactions:   Test skipped because the database doesn't support transactions
wisconsin:      Total time:  6 wallclock secs ( 1.89 usr  0.86 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  2.75 CPU)

TOTALS                              1327.00  356.15  118.16  474.31 3425950




 

HT off



Code:
alter-table:    Total time: 11 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr  0.01 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  0.04 CPU)
ATIS:           Total time: 14 wallclock secs ( 4.90 usr  1.56 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  6.46 CPU)
big-tables:     Total time: 10 wallclock secs ( 2.77 usr  2.73 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  5.50 CPU)
connect:        Total time: 63 wallclock secs (21.46 usr 17.05 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys = 38.51 CPU)
create:         Total time: 65 wallclock secs ( 0.79 usr  0.46 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  1.25 CPU)
insert:         Total time: 746 wallclock secs (268.72 usr 80.74 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys = 349.46 CPU)
select:         Total time: 344 wallclock secs (25.08 usr  6.70 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys = 31.78 CPU)
transactions:   Test skipped because the database doesn't support transactions
wisconsin:      Total time:  5 wallclock secs ( 1.79 usr  0.70 sys +  0.00 cusr  0.00 csys =  2.49 CPU)


TOTALS                              1257.00  319.99  108.41  428.40 3425950




 

doing the math.. we see that mysql with HT off performs almost 6-7% better. So if you are looking to run a high volume SQL server.. turn HT off!